Freedom Through Disobedience — A Closer Reading

(0 User reviews) 195

In Category - Democracy Rights

Authors: Das, Chitta Ranjan, 1870-1925 Digital Source: Project Gutenberg Gutenberg Release Year: 2011 First Publication Year: Not confirmed

Key Word: India -- Politics and government -- 1919-1947; Civil disobedience -- India Target Reader: Readers of public-domain and historical texts

Book Edition: Project Gutenberg digital edition Book Language: en

Edition facts

Words 21,652

Reading time 95 min

Text sections 2

For Freedom Through Disobedience — A Closer Reading, the stored edition analysis reports 21,652 words, 1 hr 35 min estimated reading time, and 2 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 23.2 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “India -- Politics and government -- 1919-1947,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Source: Project Gutenberg record #35349

C. R. Das's 1922 presidential address to the Indian National Congress, arguing that civil disobedience is a spiritual and political necessity, drawing parallels between Gandhi's trial and Christ's, and outlining a decentralized vision of self-government rooted in Indian village systems.

Editorial Edition Score 4.5/5

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated

Description quality20 pts
Title & short description10 pts
Source metadata20 pts
Text length15 pts
Chapters / structure15 pts
EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

File: pg35349

Read the Text

E-text prepared by Bryan Ness and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team (http://www.pgdp.net) from page images generously made available by Internet Archive (http://www.archive.org)

Note: Project Gutenberg also has an HTML version of this file which includes the original illustration. See 35349-h.htm or 35349-h.zip: (https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/35349/pg35349-images.html) or (https://www.gutenberg.org/files/35349/35349-h.zip)

Images of the original pages are available through Internet Archive. See http://www.archive.org/details/freedomthroughdi00dascuoft

FREEDOM THROUGH DISOBEDIENCE

C. R. DAS President of the 37th Indian National Congress, Gaya, 1922.

Arka Publishing House, George Town, Madras. 1922

Imperial Book Depot, Delhi.

Printed at the Manoranjini Press, Sowcarpet, Madras.

FREEDOM THROUGH DISOBEDIENCE

_The following is the full text of the Presidential Address of Desabhandhu C. R. Das at the thirty-seventh session of the Indian National Congress held at Gaya on 26th December 1922:--_

SISTERS AND BROTHERS,--

As I stand before you to-day, a sense of overwhelming loss overtakes me, and I can scarce give expression to what is uppermost in the minds of all and everyone of us. After a memorable battle which he gave to the Bureaucracy, Mahatma Gandhi has been seized and cast into prison; and we shall not have his guidance in the proceedings of the Congress this year. But there is inspiration for all of us in the last stand which he made in the citadel of the enemy, in the last defiance which he hurled at the agents of the Bureaucracy. To read a story equal in pathos, in dignity, and in sublimity you have to go back over two thousand years, when Jesus of Nazareth, "as one that perverted the people" stood to take his trial before a foreign tribunal.

"And Jesus stood before the Governor: and the Governor asked him saying, Art thou the king of the Jews? And Jesus said unto him, Thou sayest.

"And when he has accused of the chief priests and elders, he answered nothing.

"Then said Pilate unto him, Hearest thou not how many things they witness against thee?

"And he answered him too never a word; insomuch that the Governor marvelled greatly."

Mahatma Gandhi took a different course. He admitted that he was guilty, and he pointed out to the public Prosecutor, that his guilt was greater than he, the Prosecutor, had alleged; but he maintained that if he had offended against the law of Bureaucracy in so offending, he had obeyed the law of God. If I may hazard a guess, the Judge who tried him and who passed a sentence of imprisonment on him was filled with the same feeling of marvel as Pontius Pilate had been.

Great in taking decisions, great in executing them, Mahatma Gandhi was incomparably great in the last stand which he made on behalf of his country. He is undoubtedly one of the greatest men that the world has ever seen. The world hath need of him and if he is mocked and jeered at by "the people of importance," the "people with a stake in the country"--Scribes and Pharisees of the days of Christ he will be gratefully remembered now and always by a nation which he led from victory to victory.

Gentlemen, the time is a critical one and it is important to seize upon the real issue which divides the people from the Bureaucracy and its Indian allies. During the period of repression which began about this time last year, it was this issue which pressed itself on our attention. This policy of repression was supported and in some cases instigated by the Moderate Leaders who are in the Executive Government. I do not charge those who supported the Government with dishonesty or want of patriotism. I say they were led away by the battle cry of Law and Order. And it is because I believe that there is a fundamental confusion of thought behind this attitude of mind that I propose to discuss this plea of Law and Order. "Law and Order" has indeed been the last refuge of Bureaucracies all over the world.

It has been gravely asserted not only by the Bureaucracy but also by its apologists, the Moderate Party, that a settled Government is the first necessity of any people and that the subject has no right to present his grievances except in a constitutional way, by which I understand in some way recognised by the constitution. If you cannot actively co-operate in the maintenance of "the law of the land" they say, "it is your duty as a responsible citizen to obey it passively. Non-resistance is the least that the Government is entitled to expect from you."

Continue Reading →

C. R. Das opens his 1922 presidential address to the Indian National Congress by comparing Mahatma Gandhi's trial to that of Jesus before Pontius Pilate, noting that Gandhi 'admitted that he was guilty' but maintained he had 'obeyed the law of God.' This framing sets the tone for a speech that treats political disobedience as a moral and spiritual act, not merely a tactical one. Das repeatedly invokes religious language and historical parallels to elevate the struggle against British rule, while also engaging with contemporary European political theory to argue for a uniquely Indian form of democracy.

Gandhi as a Christ-like Figure

Das devotes his opening paragraphs to a sustained comparison between Gandhi and Jesus Christ. He describes Gandhi's last stand as 'equal in pathos, in dignity, and in sublimity' to Christ's trial, and suggests that the judge who sentenced Gandhi was 'filled with the same feeling of marvel as Pontius Pilate.' This is not a casual allusion; Das uses the biblical narrative to reframe Gandhi's imprisonment as a victory. He writes that Gandhi 'pointed out to the public Prosecutor, that his guilt was greater than he, the Prosecutor, had alleged,' thereby turning the legal proceeding into a confession of higher allegiance. The speech thus begins by establishing that disobedience to unjust law is obedience to divine law, a theme that recurs throughout.

The Spiritual Basis of Democracy

Das draws on the work of an unnamed European writer to critique 'practical politics' for lacking 'a really spiritual basis.' He quotes approvingly: 'is our daily life profane and only so far as we rise out of it do we approach the sacred life? Then no wonder politics are what they have become.' For Das, true democracy is not a mechanical system but a 'continual self-modification' that integrates individual, group, and national wills into a 'collective will.' He insists that 'the essence of democracy is creating' and that the state is 'a process,' not a static unit. This philosophical argument serves as a bridge between his religious framing and his concrete proposals for governance.

A Decentralized Vision for India

Das proposes a concrete scheme of government rooted in India's 'ancient village system.' He lists five principles: local centres based on villages, integration into larger groups, a unifying state that emerges from these groups, practical autonomy for local centres, and a central government with mainly advisory powers. He urges that 'the work of organising these local centres should be forthwith commenced,' using modern sub-divisions as starting points. This vision is explicitly contrasted with European models, which Das argues have suffered from a lack of spiritual foundation. His plan is both a political blueprint and a philosophical statement about the relationship between the individual and the nation.

Das's address is notable for its fusion of religious imagery, political theory, and practical proposals. Readers should attend to how he moves between registers—from the biblical to the bureaucratic—without losing his central argument that freedom requires a moral reordering of society. The speech is best understood as a document of its moment, shaped by Gandhi's imprisonment and the Congress's internal debates, but its core claim—that disobedience can be a form of obedience to a higher law—remains its most provocative and enduring element.

That old speech of Das's—the way he frames obedience as something almost sacred—stayed with me long after I put it down. It made me think of India for Indians Enlarged Edition — Text and Context, where the same longing for rooted self-rule feels quieter, more like a memory of home. Both left me sitting still, just turning pages.