Stephen H. Branch's Alligator, Vol. 1 no. 12, July 10, 1858 — Text and Context

(0 User reviews)   263
In Category - Government
Branch, Stephen H., 1813- [Editor] Project Gutenberg 2017 1858
New York (N.Y.) -- Politics and government Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 10,785
Reading time 47 min
Text sections 2

Stephen H. Branch's Alligator, Vol. 1 no. 12, July 10, 1858 — Text and Context can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 10,785 words, 47 min estimated reading time, and 2 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 20.8 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “New York (N.Y.) -- Politics and government,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

This issue of Stephen H. Branch's Alligator (July 10, 1858) attacks James Gordon Bennett, P.T. Barnum, and Mayor Daniel F. Tiemann with vivid accusations of political treachery and personal scandal, while also printing official city notices on swine removal and market regulations.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.5/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

eek Secretary,) who expostulated, and strove by every artifice in his prolific resources, to induce me not to publish Carson’s Card until I had seen Mr. Bennett. But I demanded him to let the Card appear on the following morning, and told him that himself and Bennett should be ashamed of themselves for striving to sell Carson through me, and that I believed Bennett had already received thousands of dollars for his contemplated sell of Carson, in favor of one of the wealthy candidates. My withdrawal of Carson led to the election of Ambrose C. Kingsland, a very illiterate man, and one of the meanest of the human species, and the oiliest and biggest conspirator and public thief since the days of the Roman Cataline. In 1853, Bennett asked me to introduce the name of Alderman A. A. Denman, of the Sixteenth Ward, as a candidate for Mayor, to whom I was imparting the rudiments of the English language, at his house in Nineteenth street. Denman was Chairman of the Committee that reported favorably at my request, on awarding the Corporation Printing to the _Herald_ at $3,000 per annum, and the other journals at $1,000. Bennett seemed grateful to Denman for his favorable Printing Report, and I really thought he was sincere in his contemplated advocation of Denman for the Mayoralty; and I saw Denman, and he permitted me to use his name in connection with the Mayoralty, and I began to write articles, and published them in the _Herald_, strongly recommending Denman to the Mayoralty. At this time, Denman was one of the most popular men in the democratic party, and his annunciation for Mayor, confused the leaders and aspirants of all parties. Presto! Bennett announces another candidate, in a sort of a half-and-half black mail way, and I instantly withdrew Denman, who was sadly disappointed at the loss of the Mayoralty honors, and joined the most bloated thieves of all parties, in the odious Common Counsel of 1852 and 1853, and he was soon forever lost as an honorable public man. And now this Scotch reprobate comes forward, without a blush on his vicious cheeks, and prates of a Tax Payer’s Party, in order to effect some hellish thievish purpose. Perhaps his object is to nominate Judge Russell, or Fire Marshal Baker, or Galbraith, or some of his roguish go-betweens and thimble-riggers for Mayor, so that he can occupy the pleasant relations of Peter Cooper to Mayor Tiemann, his amiable son-in-law. But how the intelligent tax payers of the Metropolis can be so easily and so often bamboozled by this superficial Scotch Juggler, is a mystery to me, when they all know that he has always favored vice, and stabbed virtue. And if there ever was a candidate for office, during Bennett’s long editorial career, whom he did not sell, or if there ever was a truly virtuous aspirant for public honors, whose election Bennett ever sincerely advocated before the people, without a cash consideration, I should like to see the most extraordinary anomaly. Bennett very ingeniously plasters his victims with disgusting panegyric, for a brief period, when he lets loose the dogs of Tartarus, and while they devour them, he fills his coffers with gold from every candidate in the field, to whom he has pledged his support. But he is very old, and the devil will soon have him, and millions will rejoice when old Nick drags him to his fervent realms, and begins his merited tortures. And it will require wasteless years to burn the sins from his infamous and loathsome and nauseous carcase. The creation of James Gordon Bennett’s Tax Payer’s Party, after his cash advocation of all the abandoned scamps of America to office for thirty years, is the most amusing proposition of the age. And yet the omnipotent ballot stuffers may come to his rescue, and adopt his plans. And why should they not? Is not Barnum again abroad, and about to shake the world with another humbug. Barnum has grown prodigiously affluent since the Hard times began, and since money became scarce, and since people began to starve, and since the elements of Pluto leveled his Oriental Palace to the ground, (which was highly insured!) and above all, since he took as partner, that cunning old rat, James W. Gerard, who, like Dick Connolly and Simeon Draper, is ever found in all political camps. Gerard was the real originator of the Joice Heath imposture, and all of Barnum’s humbugs, and has borne him through all his financial clock troubles, for which he has got enough from Barnum to enable him to sustain his chariots and postilions and magnificent establishment in Gramercy Park until he dies. It was Gerard who introduced Kingsland for Mayor, and other successful candidates, and, in the dark, advocated Fernando Wood’s course down to his disastrous exodus from public life. And it was Gerard who sustained Matsell through all his infamous career, down to the famous meeting in the Tabernacle, and in the Legislative lobby, even going into the seats of members, and coaxing them in various ways to spare Matsell. And it was Gerard who, after Wood had fallen, went into the camp of Tiemann, where he is now, in order to cut the throats of Tiemann and the Coopers the first opportunity, and is at this moment, in collusion with Bennett in the formation of a Tax Payer’s Party. “All things to all men” is the motto of Gerard, and he has played his card adroitly for nearly half a century. But he has now probably got his last set of false teeth, and his last wig, and will probably soon die of old age like his old friend Bennett, who have operated together in ambuscade, for thirty unbroken years, in all the political villainy that has been concocted during this long and eventful period. No matter who succeeds in the elections, Gerard and Bennett are in the triumphant camps, as now: Bennett in Buchanan’s White House, and Gerard in Mayor Tiemann’s confidence, and both playing into each others hands, like Draper and Connolly. Picolomini is the last card that these jugglers will play. Gerard is a snob and a dandy, and an Opera exquisite, and it was he, (through Barnum,) who introduced Jenny Lind to the Americans, and got Bennett, for a large sum, to abuse Barnum and Jenny Lind, as an advertisement. Bennett did not get less than $20,000 from _Gerard_ and Barnum for his daily abuse of Jenny Lind and Barnum. I was daily in the _Herald_ office in those days, and I often saw Barnum closeted with Frederic Hudson, and James Gordon Bennett. And Gerard and Barnum have already arranged with Bennett, and paid him the cash down, to abuse Picolomini, while the _Times_ and _Tribune_ and many other journals are to be paid to praise her. And such a yell as we shall have on her arrival, will frighten the rats and cats. For, in this funny world, blarney is regarded as sincere praise and evidence of merit, while detraction is persecution, which verdant people won’t tolerate, and especially when hurled at such fascinating creatures as Fanny Elssler, or Jenny Lind, or Picolomini. This is certainly a very curious world, and, like Dr. Franklin, I am curious to know if our spiritual existence is to be as curious as our material; and I am extremely anxious to learn if Bennett, Barnum, and Gerard are to have an eternal abode in Heaven?

This issue of Stephen H. Branch's Alligator opens with a blistering attack on three prominent New York figures: James Gordon Bennett, P.T. Barnum, and Mayor Daniel F. Tiemann. Branch accuses Bennett of political double-dealing in the 1850 mayoral race, claiming the editor used him to promote a candidate only to secretly back others. The language is theatrical—Bennett is called a “hypocritical old villain” who “smiled like Richard and Iago.” Branch then pivots to a scandalous allegation against Mayor Tiemann, involving a forced seduction on Randall’s Island. The paper also includes official city notices about swine removal and market regulations, creating a jarring contrast between sensational personal attacks and dry municipal bureaucracy.

Political Betrayal and the Mayoral Race of 1850

Branch recounts his involvement in the 1850 mayoral election, where he claims Bennett enlisted him to write editorials supporting Alfred Carson. According to Branch, Bennett secretly courted other wealthy candidates while assuring Branch of his loyalty. The narrative is detailed: Branch describes confronting Bennett “in a towering rage” and ultimately writing Carson’s declination, which “rocked the parties of that day to their foundations.” The account is framed as a personal betrayal, with Branch positioning himself as a defender of honest politics against corrupt newspapermen. The excerpt does not reveal the election’s outcome, but the episode illustrates Branch’s method of mixing firsthand testimony with moral outrage.

Scandalous Allegations Against Mayor Tiemann

Branch levels a grave accusation against Mayor Daniel F. Tiemann, alleging he forced a woman into a sexual relationship on Randall’s Island. The story includes a promise of $500, a friend’s written disclosure to a “Ten Governor,” and Tiemann’s reaction: “he colored into a ball of fire, and left in shame and silence.” Branch claims the governor suppressed the matter out of concern for Tiemann’s family, including his father and his wife, the adopted daughter of Peter Cooper. The language is incendiary—Branch asserts Tiemann is “guilty of crimes that should consign him to the rack, and to an eternal hell.” No corroborating evidence is provided, and the excerpt does not indicate any legal or public response.

Official Notices and Municipal Governance

Sandwiched between the personal attacks are two official notices from the City Inspector’s Department. One grants farmers free use of space at Broadway and Sixth Avenue for selling produce until noon. Another, dated June 18, 1853, orders the removal of all swine kept south of 86th Street, citing public health nuisances. The resolutions are printed verbatim, including the requirement that premises be “thoroughly cleaned and purified.” These documents contrast sharply with Branch’s hyperbolic style, offering a glimpse into the mundane regulatory work of antebellum New York. Their inclusion suggests Branch used his paper both as a platform for muckraking and as a public bulletin board for city ordinances.

Readers should approach Branch’s accusations with caution: the excerpts provide no external verification for the claims against Bennett, Barnum, or Tiemann. The paper’s value lies in its raw, partisan voice and its juxtaposition of scandal with official notices, revealing the tangled relationship between journalism, politics, and municipal governance in 1850s New York. The Alligator is best read as a primary document of personal vendetta and civic life, not as a reliable news source.

Reading Branch's furious little paper, I keep thinking how these old quarrels fade into odd poetry—the city's noise becoming almost ghostly. The Ghost of Chatham; A Vision Dedicated to the House of Peers — Reading Notes carries that same strange distance, like overhearing a voice from a room we'll never enter. Both feel less like arguments now, more like weather.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Your personal reading reflection

Build a private reading journal entry for this title.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Where are you in your reading?

2

What was your overall reaction to the book?

3

Would you recommend this book to another reader?

4

Did the language feel accessible?

Related eBooks