Stephen H. Branch's Alligator, Vol. 1 no. 09, June 19, 1858 — Reading Companion

(0 User reviews)   294
In Category - Government
Branch, Stephen H., 1813- [Editor] Project Gutenberg 2015 1858
New York (N.Y.) -- Politics and government Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 10,043
Reading time 44 min
Text sections 2

This digital edition of Stephen H. Branch's Alligator, Vol. 1 no. 09, June 19, 1858 — Reading Companion is described by source-level measurements including 10,043 words, 44 min estimated reading time, and 2 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 20.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “New York (N.Y.) -- Politics and government,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

This issue of Stephen H. Branch's 1858 newspaper combines a dramatic dialogue between James Gordon Bennett and a boy named John Kelly with a vividly detailed account of Henry J. Raymond's early poverty, using recurring images of cramped spaces and physical discomfort to expose the gritty realities behind New York's press elite.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.4/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

of the enormous receipts of this famous Ball has been devoted to the purchase of one little loaf of John Hecker’s Bread, nor to the relief of the indigent thousands, whom the receipts of this Ball were intended to relieve. The _Hunter Woodis Society_ Managers told me on Monday last, that the receipts of the Crystal Palace Ball were §10,147,38, and that the expenses were $6,828,03, leaving a balance in the hands of their Treasurer of $3,319,35, which is now in their Safe, and that they have not disbursed one cent for bread nor any thing else for the relief of the poor, and do not intend to, until the next winter. I had a long interview with the officers of the self-constituted _Hunter Woodis Society_, (at their official quarters,) who are remarkably well clad, and smelt very strongly of cologne and pomatum, and they seemed extremely happy in their gaudy easy chairs, and I learn that they can often be seen on the fashionable avenues with fast steeds, and at the Italian Opera, and the aristocratic clubs. One of the leaders of the _Hunter Woodis Society_ (doubtless fearing that I was about to let loose my _Alligator_ upon himself and associates,) breathed honied words during my visit to the Society, and boldly said that Peter Cooper was anything but an honest man, but that the _Hunter Woodis_ Managers were all honorable men, and that all the members of the _Hunter Woodis Society_ were Know Nothings. He told me this three times, lest I should forget it, the fool supposing that I regarded Know Nothing thieves with less abhorrence than Irish or British thieves, of the Busteed, Connolly, or Matsell brand. I believe that most of the charitable funds of the “American and Foreign Emigrant Protective and Employment Society,” and of the “Academy of Music and Crystal Palace Balls,” have gone into the pockets and bellies and bladders of the scoundrels who collected those sacred funds for the immediate relief of the Emigrants and Starving Poor of New York.

Startling Revelations.

This ninth issue of Stephen H. Branch's Alligator (June 19, 1858) opens with a theatrical dialogue between James Gordon Bennett and a boy named John Kelly, who arrives in rags and barefoot. The scene quickly becomes a platform for patriotic sentiment and anti-British rhetoric, as young Kelly defends his American identity and denounces the oppression of Ireland. Branch then shifts to a detailed, almost claustrophobic description of the living conditions of Henry J. Raymond (future editor of the New York Times) and Branch's own brother Thomas, lodging in a cramped attic room. The recurring motif of physical discomfort—bumped heads, squeaking cots, a three-legged table—anchors the narrative in tangible, often humorous, detail.

Theatrical Exchanges and Political Posturing

The opening dialogue between Bennett and John Kelly reads like a stage script, complete with stage directions like "Enter John Kelly in rags and barefooted." Kelly's responses are crafted to showcase his intelligence and love of liberty, while Bennett probes his background. The exchange reveals Branch's method: using direct speech to dramatize political and personal conflicts. Kelly's claim that Scotland and Wales failed to sympathize with Ireland's fight for freedom is a pointed jab at Bennett's Scottish heritage. This theatrical structure recurs throughout the issue, turning editorial commentary into performed argument.

Cramped Quarters and Comic Detail

Branch's description of Raymond and his brother's attic room is a set piece of vivid, comic realism. The room has a "pigeon-house ceiling," a single squeaking cot bought at auction, a pine table with only three legs (the fourth being Raymond's cane), and no washbowl or mirror. Branch must squat to enter and often bumps his head. The scene is filled with sensory details: the sky-light window, the precarious ladder, the dilapidated roof. This focus on material poverty and physical awkwardness serves to humanize the future editor, contrasting his later prominence with his humble beginnings.

Recurring Images of Bodily Discomfort

Throughout the excerpt, Branch returns to images of bodily strain and discomfort. Raymond sleeps with a toothache poultice; Branch tickles his brother's feet, causing a chain reaction that dislodges Raymond's poultice. The men are described as "very short" and able to walk erect, while Branch, taller, suffers. The repeated emphasis on cramped spaces, aching heads, and disrupted sleep creates a texture of physicality that grounds the narrative in the mundane realities of 19th-century urban life. These details are not merely decorative; they underscore the precariousness of the journalists' existence.

Movement Between Scenes and Perspectives

Branch structures the issue by moving abruptly between scenes: from the formal dialogue of Bennett and Kelly to the intimate, almost farcical bedroom scene. This shift in tone and setting—from public interview to private lodging—mirrors the newspaper's broader strategy of juxtaposing high political drama with low domestic comedy. The movement is not seamless but jarring, forcing the reader to adjust quickly. Branch's authorial voice remains present throughout, guiding the reader's attention and offering commentary, as when he notes that the building "could not be less than one hundred and seventy years old."

Readers should attend to Branch's use of physical detail as a lens for social commentary. The cramped attic, the three-legged table, and the tickling episode are not mere anecdotes but evidence of a journalistic style that finds political meaning in the material conditions of its subjects. The Alligator offers a ground-level view of New York's press world, where editorial careers are built in leaky attics and reputations are made through theatrical confrontation.

There’s something about the cramped, dusty corners of Branch’s Alligator—Raymond’s cold rooms, the pressmen’s sweat—that lingers like a half-remembered ache. It made me think, oddly, of Imperial Federation: The Problem of National Unity — Themes and Context, that quieter argument about how vast ideals are built from small, uncomfortable arrangements. Both feel like old letters, brittle but honest. I set one down, and the other simply came to mind.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

What did you think of this book?

Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

What is your current status with this title?

2

What was your overall reaction to the book?

3

Would you encourage someone else to read it?

4

What was the reading difficulty like?

Related eBooks