History of the Thirty-Ninth Congress of the United States — A Reader’s Guide

(0 User reviews)   493
In Category - Government
Barnes, William Horatio, 1832-1879 Project Gutenberg 2008 Not confirmed
United States -- Politics and government -- 1865-1869; United States. Congress (39th : 1865-1867) Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 273,141
Reading time 1188 min
Text sections 23

This digital edition of History of the Thirty-Ninth Congress of the United States — A Reader’s Guide is described by source-level measurements including 273,141 words, 19 hr 48 min estimated reading time, and 23 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 24.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “United States -- Politics and government -- 1865-1869,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Barnes's contemporary history of the 1865-1867 Congress, structured around abridged speeches and legislative debates, with a focus on Reconstruction and the constitutional basis of representation after the Civil War.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.9/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

Momentous Events of the Vacation -- Opening of the Senate -- Mr. Wade -- Mr. Sumner -- Mr. Wilson -- Mr. Harris -- Edward McPherson -- As Clerk of the preceding Congress, he calls the House to order -- Interruption of Roll-call by Mr. Maynard -- Remarks by Mr. Brooks -- His Colloquy with Mr. Stevens -- Mr. Colfax elected Speaker -- His Inaugural Address -- The Test Oath.

The Thirty-ninth Congress of the United States, convened in the Capitol at Washington on the fourth of December, 1865. Since the adjournment of the Thirty-eighth Congress, events of the greatest moment had transpired--events which invested its successor with responsibilities unparalleled in the history of any preceding legislative body.

Abraham Lincoln, sixteenth President of the United States, had been slain by the hand of the assassin. The crime had filled the land with horror. The loss of its illustrious victim had veiled the nation in unaffected grief.

By this great national calamity, Andrew Johnson, who on the fourth of March preceding had taken his seat simply to preside over the deliberations of the Senate, became President of the United States.

Meanwhile the civil war, which had been waged with such terrible violence and bloodshed for four years preceding, came to a sudden termination. The rebel armies, under Generals Lee and Johnston, had surrendered to the victorious soldiers of the United States, who in their generosity had granted to the vanquished terms so mild and easy as to excite universal surprise.

Jefferson Davis, Alexander H. Stephens, and some other leaders in the rebellion, had been captured and held for a time as State prisoners; but, at length, all save the "President of the Confederate States" were released on parole, and finally pardoned by the President.

The President had issued a proclamation granting amnesty and pardon to "all who directly or indirectly participated in the rebellion, with restoration of all rights of property, except as to slaves," on condition of their subscribing to a prescribed oath. By the provisions of this proclamation, fourteen classes of persons were excepted from the benefits of the amnesty offered therein, and yet "any person belonging to the excepted classes" was encouraged to make special application to the President for pardon, to whom clemency, it was declared, would "be liberally extended." In compliance with this invitation, multitudes had obtained certificates of pardon from the President, some of whom were at once elected by the Southern people, to represent them, as Senators and Representatives, in the Thirty-ninth Congress.

The President had further carried on the work of reconstruction by appointing Provisional Governors for many of the States lately in rebellion. He had recognized and entered into communication with the Legislatures of these States, prescribing certain terms on which they might secure representation in Congress, and recognition of "all their rights under the Constitution."

By these and many other events which had transpired since the expiration of the preceding Congress, the legislation pertaining to reconstruction had become a work of vast complexity, involving principles more profound, and questions more difficult, than ever before presented for the consideration and solution of men assembled in a legislative capacity.

At twelve o'clock on the day designated in the Constitution for the meeting of Congress, the Senate assembled, and was called to order by Hon. Lafayette S. Foster, President pro tempore. Senators from twenty-five States were in their seats, and answered to their names. Rev. E. H. Gray, Chaplain of the Senate, invoked the blessing of Almighty God upon Congress, and prayed "that all their deliberations and enactments might be such as to secure the Divine approval, and insure the unanimous acquiescence of the people, and command the respect of the nations of the earth."

Soon after the preliminary formalities of opening the Senate had transpired, Benjamin F. Wade, Senator from Ohio, inaugurated the labors of the Thirty-ninth Congress, and significantly foreshadowed one of its most memorable acts by introducing "a bill to regulate the elective franchise in the District of Columbia."

The Senate signified its willingness to enter at once upon active duty by giving unanimous consent to Mr. Sumner, Senator from Massachusetts, to introduce a number of important bills. The measures thus brought before the Senate were clearly indicative of the line of policy which Congress would pursue. The bills introduced were designed "to carry out the principles of a republican form of government in the District of Columbia;" "to present an oath to maintain a republican form of government in the rebel States;" "to enforce the amendment to the Constitution abolishing slavery;" "to enforce the guarantee of a republican form of government in certain States where governments have been usurped or overthrown."

Barnes opens his preface with a striking metaphor: the work of the Thirty-Ninth Congress is a sequel to the Rebellion, and its task was to “administer upon its effects.” He acknowledges that the legislative fabric did not go up without “the sound of the hammer,” and that discussion—not silence—was the process by which legislation was achieved. The author explicitly warns readers that his history is selective: many important speeches and members are omitted, and those who spoke most frequently were not always the most useful. This candor frames the book as an avowedly partial record, one that prioritizes the most “striking or characteristic” passages in the orators’ own words.

The Author’s Method: Abridged Speeches, Not Synopses

Barnes states plainly that he has made “no attempt to give a summary or synopsis of speeches.” Instead, he reproduces what seemed “the most striking or characteristic passage in a speech… in the words of the orator.” This editorial choice means the reader encounters extended, verbatim excerpts—often several paragraphs long—rather than paraphrased arguments. The effect is to preserve the rhetorical texture of congressional debate, including its repetitions, emphases, and emotional appeals. For example, in the excerpt on representation, Representative Conkling’s speech is given at length, with its cascading rhetorical questions (“Shall all this be?… Shall one white man have as much share…?”) and its blunt language about races deemed “so low, so bad, so ignorant, so stupid.” The reader is thus placed inside the live argument, not given a neutral summary.

The Central Debate: Representation and the “Negro Question”

Barnes acknowledges that one subject—the “negro question”—may seem to have occupied too much of Congress’s time, but he insists it was “thrust upon” the legislators. The excerpts bear this out: the core of the debate reproduced concerns the basis of representation and the proposed constitutional amendment. Conkling’s argument turns on a principle “already imbedded in the Constitution”: that representation belongs to those who have political existence. He attacks the paradox that freed slaves would add to a state’s congressional representation while being denied the vote themselves. The language is stark: “Shall the death of slavery add two-fifths to the entire power which slavery had when slavery was living?” The reader sees how the amendment was framed not as a guarantee of black suffrage, but as a penalty for disfranchisement—a race excluded from the ballot would also be excluded from the count for representation.

Rhetorical Strategies in the Excerpted Speeches

The excerpts reveal a consistent rhetorical pattern: speakers build their case through a series of pointed, often indignant questions. Conkling’s speech, for instance, strings together seven “Shall…” questions in rapid succession, each amplifying the perceived injustice. He also uses hypothetical extremes: “If a race is so vile or worthless that to belong to it is alone cause of exclusion from political action, the race is not to be counted here in Congress.” The language is deliberately provocative, designed to force a logical conclusion. Barnes’s decision to preserve these passages—rather than condense them—allows the modern reader to experience the emotional temperature of the floor debate. The speeches are not dry legal arguments; they are performances aimed at persuasion, and the text retains that performative quality.

What the Excerpts Leave Unsaid

Because Barnes’s history is a selection, the excerpts necessarily omit the full legislative context. The reader does not learn from these pages alone which measures ultimately passed, how votes were cast, or what compromises were struck. The preface warns that many important members are not quoted at all, and that “men from whom no quotation is made… may be among the foremost in watchfulness.” This means the excerpts give a skewed impression of who dominated the debate. Moreover, the focus on the “negro question” may underrepresent other major issues—such as the readmission of Southern states, the Freedmen’s Bureau, or the Civil Rights Act—that the full book likely covers. The reader should treat the excerpts as a sample of one strand of argument, not as a comprehensive record.

Barnes’s preface positions his work as a “sequel” to the war, and the excerpts confirm that the Thirty-Ninth Congress was consumed by the question of how to translate military victory into a new constitutional order. The reader who approaches this book expecting a neutral chronicle will instead find a deliberately shaped collection of speeches, chosen for their rhetorical force. The best strategy is to read each excerpt as a primary source—a window into the arguments that shaped Reconstruction—while keeping in mind the author’s own admission of selectivity.

That rainy afternoon, the History of the Thirty-Ninth Congress made me dwell on how nations stitch themselves back together after fractures—how representation is debated when the ground shifts beneath. Later, half-absorbed, I found myself in Latvia & Russia: One problem of the world-peace considered — Text and Context, another argument about borders, dignity, and the quiet work of defining a people. The rain kept falling, and the themes simply kept talking to each other.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Before you leave, reflect on the book

Use these questions to collect your thoughts before moving on.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Where are you in your reading?

2

How did the book work for you overall?

3

Is this a title you would suggest to others?

4

Did the language feel accessible?

Related eBooks