Presidential addresses and state papers, Volume 4 (of 7) — Background and Themes

(0 User reviews) 3079

In Category - Government

Authors: Roosevelt, Theodore, 1858-1919 Digital Source: Project Gutenberg Gutenberg Release Year: 2025 First Publication Year: Not confirmed

Key Word: Roosevelt, Theodore, 1858-1919; United States -- Politics and government -- 1901-1909 Target Reader: Readers of public-domain and historical texts

Book Edition: Project Gutenberg digital edition Book Language: en

Edition facts

Words 98,030

Reading time 427 min

Text sections 59

Before opening Presidential addresses and state papers, Volume 4 (of 7) — Background and Themes, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 98,030 words, 7 hr 7 min estimated reading time, and 59 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 32.1 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Roosevelt, Theodore, 1858-1919,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Source: Project Gutenberg record #76020

This volume collects Theodore Roosevelt's speeches from May to October 1905, revealing his rhetorical strategies in addressing diverse audiences—from merchants and lawyers to veterans and students—with a focus on duty, civic responsibility, and the balance between material progress and moral uplift.

Editorial Edition Score 4.9/5

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated

Description quality20 pts
Title & short description10 pts
Source metadata20 pts
Text length15 pts
Chapters / structure15 pts
EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

File: pg76020

Read the Text

e devotion to the right as each side had given it the light to see the right, shown alike by those who warred under one banner and by those who warred under the other.

I congratulate the people of Brooklyn, not primarily upon raising this statue, because that they ought to do, but upon the opportunity, upon the chance of having it to raise. I congratulate them upon the good fortune of having a fellow-citizen who in war and in peace alike served his people so well as to make it their duty, not so much to him as to themselves, to erect this statue that it might serve as a lesson for the generations to come. And, my fellow-citizens, I am sure we all realize the peculiar appropriateness of having the statue of General Slocum received on behalf of the city of New York by its chief magistrate, whose father was General Slocum’s illustrious commander.

Surely there is need for me to say but little in emphasis of what has been set forth before I began to speak as to the prime significance of General Slocum’s career. He was a fine soldier, a gallant and able commander. Once the war was over he turned as whole-heartedly to the pursuits of peace as he had during the war turned to the strife of arms. General Slocum was one of those men on whose career we are fortunately able to dwell in its entirety. We do not have to dwell with emphasis on part of it because we do not care to speak of another part of it. We are able to point to General Slocum as the type of what a decent American citizen should be, as a man who was an example in his family life, an example in his business relations, an honest and upright public servant, no less than a tried and fearless soldier.

Now I want our people to remember the two sides of the lesson taught by General Slocum’s life. A successful war for unrighteousness is the most dreadful of all things; it is the thing that sets back more than aught else the course of civilization. But no people worth preserving ever existed or will exist that was not able to fight well if the need arose. So it is with the individual. The man who possesses great ability and great courage unaccompanied by the moral sense, a courage and ability unguided by the stern purpose to do what is just and upright, that man is rendered by the very fact of his courage and ability only so much the greater menace to the community in which he unfortunately dwells. We can not afford as a people ever to forget for one moment that ability, farsightedness, iron resolution, perseverance, willingness to do and dare, are qualities to be admired only if they are put at the service of the right, at the service of decency and of justice. The man who possesses those qualities and does not shape his course by a fundamental and underlying moral principle is a menace to each and all of us; and thrice foolish, thrice wicked is the other man who condones his moral shortcomings because of his intellectual or physical strength and prowess.

Continue Reading →

Theodore Roosevelt's fourth volume of addresses and state papers captures a president in constant motion, both geographically and rhetorically. Between May and October 1905, he spoke at merchants' clubs, college graduations, Confederate reunions, and naval vessels, tailoring his message to each audience while maintaining a consistent emphasis on duty, character, and the subordination of material gain to higher principles. The speeches are marked by a direct, conversational tone—Roosevelt frequently addresses his listeners as "my hosts" or "my fellow laymen"—and by a strategic use of historical analogy, as when he traces the evolution of law from a time when "about five per cent of any given number of children born in England were punished by hanging."

Roosevelt's Rhetorical Adaptability

Across the volume, Roosevelt shifts register with notable precision. Before the Merchants' Club in Chicago, he adopts the language of commerce and national growth; at Holy Cross College, he speaks of moral and spiritual foundations. At the unveiling of a statue of General Slocum, he invokes the Civil War as a shared sacrifice, addressing "you men of the blue and men of the gray" with equal honor. This adaptability is not mere politeness—it reflects a deliberate strategy to connect abstract principles to the lived experience of each audience. Roosevelt often frames his remarks around a single, concrete occasion—a statue unveiling, a cup presentation, a consistory's hospitality—using the event as a springboard into broader commentary on citizenship and governance.

The Layman's Critique of Law

In his Little Rock luncheon address, Roosevelt offers an extended critique of the legal profession from a self-described layman's perspective. He argues that the law has not kept pace with social change, retaining safeguards designed for an era when "the government acted as a plaintiff" and individuals needed protection from state power. Now, he contends, "the public has by no means the chance it ought to have" against corporate and individual wrongdoing. Roosevelt's language here is careful—he speaks "merely to my fellow laymen" and invites correction "from Gamaliel"—but his point is sharp: lawyers must treat their profession as a means to public service, not an end. This passage exemplifies his willingness to engage with technical subjects while maintaining an accessible, almost colloquial tone.

Recurring Motifs: Duty and Materialism

Throughout the volume, Roosevelt returns to a central dichotomy: material well-being as a foundation, and moral or spiritual life as the superstructure. At the Little Rock luncheon, he tells Civil War veterans that they "treated material considerations as dross to be cast aside" when duty called. At Chautauqua and in addresses to educational associations, he warns against valuing prosperity alone. This motif is not merely rhetorical—it structures his argument that national greatness depends on character, not wealth. Roosevelt's diction reinforces the point: he uses words like "dross," "altar," and "privilege" to elevate sacrifice above comfort, and he frequently contrasts the temporary with the enduring, urging listeners to build "the superstructure of the moral and spiritual higher life."

Direct Address and Audience Engagement

Roosevelt's speeches are studded with direct appeals to his listeners, often naming individuals or groups: "Mr. Toastmaster; Judge Rose; My Hosts." He thanks hosts, acknowledges local dignitaries, and references specific organizations—the Arkansas Consistory, the Iroquois Club, the Grand Army of the Republic. This practice creates a sense of immediacy and mutual respect. He also uses rhetorical questions and self-deprecation, as when he says, "I am speaking before Gamaliel, and shall expect correction." Such moves disarm potential critics and invite the audience into a shared inquiry. The cumulative effect is a portrait of a president who treats each speech as a conversation, not a proclamation, and who expects his listeners to engage actively with the ideas he presents.

Readers approaching this volume should attend to the interplay between occasion and argument. Roosevelt rarely delivers a generic address; each speech responds to its setting—a college commencement, a veterans' reunion, a chamber of commerce luncheon—while advancing a coherent set of convictions about duty, law, and national character. The volume rewards attention to his shifts in tone and his willingness to challenge his audience's assumptions, whether about the legal system or the meaning of prosperity. It offers a window into how a president used public speech to educate, persuade, and unify a diverse nation.

Reading this fourth volume of Roosevelt’s speeches, I felt that old ache for plainspoken duty, and it put me in mind of another quiet study of public character: The Mirrors of Downing Street Some Political Reflections by a Gentleman with a Duster — Inside the Classic. Both seem to catch statesmen mid-gesture, their best intentions fading into the hush of history.