An Apologie for the Royal Party (1659); and A Panegyric to Charles the Second (1661) — Reading Notes
Edition facts
The catalog record for An Apologie for the Royal Party (1659); and A Panegyric to Charles the Second (1661) — Reading Notes provides practical reading context through 20,168 words, 1 hr 28 min estimated reading time, and 3 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 36.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Charles II, King of England, 1630-1685 -- Early works to 1800,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
Events were at this date nearing their climax, and Evelyn, soon after the publication of his pamphlet, made persistent attempts to induce Colonel Henry Morley, then Lieutenant of the Tower of London, to declare for the King. In the edition of Baker's _Chronicle of the Kings of England_, edited by Edward Phillips, 1665, is given the following account of the negotiations (p. 736): "Mr. Evelyn gave him [Col. Morley] some visits to attemper his affection by degrees to a confidence in him, & then by consequence to ingage him in his designes; and to induce him the more powerfully thereunto, he put into his hands an excellent and unanswerable hardy treatise by him written and severall times reprinted, intituled _An Apology for the Royall Party_, which he backed with so good Argument and dextrous Addresses in the prosecution of them, that, after some private discourse, the Colonel was so well inclin'd, as to recommend to him the procurement of his Majestie's Grace for him, his Brother-in-law Mr. Fagg, and one or two more of his Relations". Phillips added an account of a letter written by Evelyn to Colonel Morley, and gave him great credit for the influence which he exerted, though Evelyn endorsed a draft of the narrative with a statement saying there "was too much said concerning me". Nevertheless part of the narrative was confirmed by Evelyn when he wrote on the title-page of the copy of the pamphlet here reproduced: "Delivered to Coll. Morley a few daies after his contest w^th Lambert in the palace yard by J. Evelyn". The "contest" with General Lambert took place on October 12 or 13 when Morley, pistol in hand, refused to allow him at the head of his troops to pass through the Palace Yard.
Evelyn also wrote on the title-page of this copy of his pamphlet "three tymes printed". In fact there were four printings, all described in the writer's _John Evelyn, a Study in Bibliophily & a Bibliography of his Writings_, New York, The Grolier Club, 1937, the one here reproduced being the fourth and final form. Nevertheless all four issues are now extremely scarce, the first printing being known in three copies (one in the United States), the second in seven (two in the United States), the third in one, and the fourth in one. This apparently unique relic of Evelyn's bold gesture on behalf of his King is in the writer's possession and is still as issued, edges untrimmed and with its eight leaves stitched in a contemporary paper wrapper. It has been reprinted only in Evelyn's _Miscellaneous Writings_, 1825, pp. 169-192.
When Charles II actually returned to England in 1660 Evelyn's feelings were deeply stirred. He had played some part in the restoration of the monarchy, and, with his literary instinct, naturally felt impelled to be among those who wished to present the King with an address on the day of his Coronation. This took place on April 23, 1661, and on the following day Evelyn recorded in his Diary: "I presented his Ma^tie with his Panegyric in the Private Chamber, which he was pleas'd to accept most graciously: I gave copies to the Lord Chancellor and most of the noblemen who came to me for it."[2] Evelyn's _Panegyric_ was thus distributed privately and no doubt in small number, so that it is today extremely uncommon, being known only in five copies, not more than one of which is in the United States of America. Evelyn possessed a copy in 1687 according to his library catalogue compiled in that year, and a copy (not necessarily the same one) is now among his books in the library of Christ Church, Oxford, but it seems to have been unknown in 1825 and was not included in the _Miscellaneous Writings_. William Upcott, the editor, in fact erroneously identified the _Panegyric_ with the anonymous piece in folio: "A Poem upon his Majesties Coronation ... Being S^t Georges day ... London, Printed for Gabriel Bedel and Thomas Collins ... 1661". This mistake was not put right until a copy of the true _Panegyric_ with Evelyn's name on the title-page was acquired for the British Museum in 1927 from the Britwell Court Library. The copy here reproduced is in the writer's collection, and has a few corrections in Evelyn's hand: (a) _XXXIII. of April_, on title-page corrected to _XXIII_; (b) p.6. l.18 _Family_ altered to _Firmament_; (c) p.8. l.16 from bottom _suffer_ altered to _surfeit_.
John Evelyn's An Apologie for the Royal Party (1659) and A Panegyric to Charles the Second (1661) are two pamphlets bound by a single author's royalist conviction, yet they differ markedly in tone and purpose. The Apologie, written when it was 'capital to speak or write in favour of him' according to Evelyn's diary, is a defensive, reasoned argument for the royal party during the Interregnum. The Panegyric, composed after the Restoration, shifts to elaborate praise, casting Charles's return as a divine miracle. Together, they illustrate how political circumstance shapes rhetorical strategy.
From Defense to Celebration
The two texts occupy distinct political moments. The Apologie responds directly to The Army's Plea for Their present Practice, a pamphlet justifying military rule. Evelyn's answer is cautious: he does not name himself, printer, or place, reflecting the danger of open royalism. The Panegyric, by contrast, is unrestrained. It opens by declaring that Charles's fortunes seem 'conducted by Men alone, and second Causes; yours only by God, and as it were by Miracle.' This shift from defensive argument to providential celebration mirrors the changed political landscape after the Restoration.
Classical and Biblical Framing
Evelyn draws heavily on classical and biblical references to legitimize monarchy. In the Panegyric, he compares Charles to a phoenix rising from his father's ashes: 'our redivive Phœnix appear'd; rising from those Sacred Ashes Testator and Heir; Father and yet Son.' He invokes the maxim 'Rex nunquam moritur' (the king never dies) and cites the wisdom of Solomon: 'Mortuus est Pater ejus, & quasi non mortuus, similem enim reliquit sibi post se.' These allusions frame the Stuart succession as natural and divinely ordained, contrasting with the chaos of republics and empires that 'lasted nor to the fourth Age without strange and prodigious tragedies.'
The King's Education and Virtue
A recurring theme is Charles's princely education under his father, the 'Kingly Martyr.' Evelyn praises Charles's early piety and his motto 'ICH DIEN' (I serve), arguing that learning obedience prepared him to command. He contrasts this with rulers who 'rashly pull it on their shoulders' without preparation. The Panegyric emphasizes that Charles's virtues are 'essential parts, and only immortal,' suggesting that the monarchy's endurance depends on the king's character. This focus on personal virtue serves to justify hereditary succession and distinguish Charles from other princes whose reigns ended in disaster.
Readers approaching these pamphlets should attend to their rhetorical strategies: the Apologie argues by refutation, the Panegyric by amplification. Evelyn's use of classical exempla and biblical typology is not mere ornament but a deliberate attempt to place the Stuart monarchy within a providential history. The texts also reveal the constraints of political writing—the earlier pamphlet's anonymity versus the later's open celebration. Comparing the two offers insight into how royalist ideology adapted to shifting fortunes.
There’s something tender about watching Evelyn pivot from cautious defense to radiant praise, as if hope itself had finally found its voice. It made me think of another quiet chronicle, A Political Diary, 1828-1830, Volume II — Inside the Classic, where a different hand traces similar longing across years. Both linger like a half-remembered conversation, gentle and true.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
How did this book work for you?
Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.