A History of Parliamentary Elections and Electioneering in the Old Days Showing the State of Political Parties and Party Warfare at the Hustings and in the House of — Text and Context
Edition facts
For A History of Parliamentary Elections and Electioneering in the Old Days Showing the State of Political Parties and Party Warfare at the Hustings and in the House of — Text and Context, the stored edition analysis reports 162,571 words, 11 hr 47 min estimated reading time, and 23 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 20.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Great Britain -- Politics and government,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
The assembling of parliaments--Synopsis of parliamentary history--Orders for the attendance of members--Qualifications for the franchise: burgesses, burgage-tenures, scot and lot, pot-wallopers, faggot-votes, splitting--Disqualifications: alms, charity, “faggots,” “occasionality”--Election of knights of the shire, and burgesses--Outlines of an election in the Middle Ages--Queen Elizabeth and her faithful Commons--An early instance of buying a seat in the Commons--Returns vested in the municipal corporations; “Money makes the mayor to go”--Privileges of parliament--“Knights girt with a sword”--Inferior standing of the citizens and burgesses sent to Parliament--Reluctance of early constituencies to sending representatives to parliament--Paid members--Members chosen and nominated by the “great families”--The Earl of Essex nominating his partisans and servants--Exemption from sending representatives to the Commons esteemed a privilege--The growth of legislative and electoral independence--The beginning of “contested elections”--Coercion at elections--Lords-lieutenant calling out the train-bands for purposes of intimidation--Early violence--_Nugæ Antiquæ_; the election of a Harrington for Bath, 1658-9; the present of a horse to paid members--The method of election for counties, cities, and boroughs--Relations of representatives with their constituents--The “wages” of members of parliament--“Extracts from the Proceedings of Lynn Regis”--An account rendered to the burgesses--The civil wars--Peers returned for the Commons in the Long Parliament after the abolition of the House of Lords. 1
Influence of administration under Charles I.--Ballad on the Commonwealth--House of Commons: “A General Sale of Rebellious Household Stuff”--The Parliament under the Restoration--Pepys and Prynne on the choosing of “knights of the shire”--Burgesses sent up at the discretion of the sheriffs--The king’s writ--Evils attending the cessation of wages to parliamentary representatives--Andrew Marvell’s ballad on a venal House of Commons--The parliament waiting on the king--Charles II. and his Commons--“Royal Resolutions,” and disrespect for the Commons--The Earl of Rochester on Charles II.’s parliament--Interference in elections--Independence of legislators _versus_ paid members--The Peers as “born legislators and councillors”--“The Pensioner Parliament” coincident with the remission of salaries to members of the Commons--“An Historical Poem,” by Andrew Marvell--Andrew Marvell as a paid member; his kindly relations with his Hull constituents--Writ for recovering arrears of parliamentary wages--Uncertainty of calling another parliament--The Duke of Buckingham’s intrigues with the Roundheads; his “Litany”--Degradation of parliament--Parody of the king’s speech--Relations of Charles II. and his Commons--Summary of Charles II.’s parliaments--Petitioners, addressers, and Abhorrers--The right of petitioning the throne--The Convention Parliament--The Long Cavalier Parliament--The Pensioner Parliament and the statute against corruption--“The Chequer Inn”--“The Parliament House to be let”--The Habeas Corpus Parliament--The country preparing for Charles II.’s fourth parliament--Election ballads: “The Poll,”--Origin of the factions of Whigs and Tories--Whig and Tory ballads--“A Tory in a Whig’s Coat”--“A Litany from Geneva,” in answer to “A Litany from St. Omer”--The Oxford Parliament of eight days--“The Statesman’s Almanack”--A group of parliamentary election ballads, 1679-80--Ballad on the Essex petitions--The Earl of Shaftesbury’s “Protestant Association”--“A Hymn exalting the Mobile to Loyalty”--The Buckingham ballad--Bribery by Sir Richard “Timber” Temple--The Wiltshire ballad--“Old Sarum”--Petitions against prerogative--The royal pretensions to absolute monarchy--The “Tantivies,” or upholders of absolute kingly rights over Church and State--“Plain Dealing; or, a Dialogue between Humphrey and Roger, as they were returning home from choosing Knights of the Shire to sit in Parliament, 1681;” “Hercules Rideing”--“A Speech without-doors, made by a Plebeian to his Noble Friends”--Philippe de Comines on the British Constitution--On freedom of speech--A true Commonwealth--The excited state of parties at the summoning of the Oxford Parliament, 1681--Ballads on the Oxford Parliament--The impeachment of Fitz-Harris, and the proposal of the opposition to exclude the Duke of York from the “Protestant succession”--Squabble on privilege between the Peers and Commons--The Oxford Parliament dismissed, after eight days, on this pretence--“The Ghost of the Late Parliament to the New One to meet at Oxford”--“On Parliament removing from London to Oxford”--“On his Majesty’s dissolving the late Parliament at Oxford”--A “Weeked” Parliament. 22
Joseph Grego’s 1886 history examines the mechanics and abuses of British parliamentary elections from the Stuart period through the reign of Queen Victoria, drawing heavily on contemporary political squibs, lampoons, and pictorial satires. The work is less a narrative of legislative reform than a catalogue of corrupt practices—bribery, intimidation, pocket boroughs, and the manipulation of the franchise—illustrated through the visual and verbal ephemera of the time. Grego’s preface frames the subject as a matter of national birthright, arguing that debauched constituencies produce corrupt legislatures, yet he concedes that even basely constituted Parliaments were “on the whole, fairly honest.”
Satirical Sources as Historical Evidence
Grego’s method is distinctive: he treats caricatures, squibs, and lampoons not as decorative additions but as primary documents that reveal the temper of electoral contests. The book’s full title promises to show “the state of political parties and party warfare at the hustings” through these materials, and the excerpts confirm that Grego integrates them into his argument. For instance, he quotes a satirical poem by W. M. Praed (1826) that mocks both Tories and Whigs for their venality, and a passage from Lord Byron’s verse that skewers a politician who “held some sinecures he wish’d abolish’d, / But that with them all law would be demolish’d.” These citations are not mere ornaments; they serve as evidence of contemporary attitudes toward corruption. Grego’s earlier works on the caricaturists James Gillray and Thomas Rowlandson suggest he was well positioned to interpret such material, though the excerpts do not detail how he reproduces or analyzes the images themselves.
The Westminster Remonstrance and Civic Resistance
A substantial portion of the excerpts focuses on the 1770 Westminster election, which followed a period of intense conflict between the Crown and the City of London. Grego recounts how the king prorogued Parliament after it approved addresses that “fortified the royal censure” of popular remonstrances. The citizens of Westminster, however, persisted in petitioning, and Grego praises their eventual success “in spite of the united efforts of the Court, the Ministers, and the Parliament.” He quotes Junius on the metropolis as “the life-blood of the state” and highlights the role of Lord Chatham and William Beckford, whose “firm attitude” is contrasted with the “subservient courtier” that a chief magistrate might become. The election itself is described in procedural detail: electors assembled at the Standard Tavern, processed with music to Sir Robert Bernard’s house, and filled Covent Garden before Sir John Hussey Delaval addressed them. Grego’s account suggests that the remonstrance movement temporarily dampened ministerial ardour, as no Court candidate was put forward in 1770.
The Limits of Grego’s Evidence
While Grego’s preface and selected passages convey a clear moral stance against electoral corruption, the excerpts do not reveal how systematically he documents bribery, intimidation, or boroughmongering across the entire period. The catalog subjects—Great Britain—Politics and government and Great Britain. Parliament—Elections—are broadly consistent with the content, but the excerpts focus heavily on the late eighteenth century, particularly the 1770 Westminster case. The earlier Stuart era and the transition to Victoria are mentioned in the title but not illustrated in the provided text. Grego’s reliance on satirical prints raises questions about representativeness: do the lampoons he reproduces reflect widespread practices or exceptional scandals? The preface’s claim that “bad as were the workings of the electoral system … Parliaments thus basely constituted were, on the whole, fairly honest” introduces a tension that the excerpts do not resolve. Readers should note that the book’s 162,571 words likely cover a broader chronological and thematic range than these samples suggest.
Grego’s history is best approached as a curated gallery of electoral malpractice, animated by the voices of satirists and the actions of civic reformers. The excerpts show a writer who values concrete episodes—the procession to Covent Garden, the king’s prorogation speech, the inscription on Beckford’s monument—over abstract theory. Readers interested in the visual culture of politics will find the promised illustrations essential, though the digital edition may not reproduce them. The work rewards those who read it alongside the caricatures it describes, as Grego’s text often serves as a gloss on the images he collected.
I keep thinking about that old study of elections—how easily voices got bought, how loud the laughter was at the polls. It made me wonder what quiet corners those same people kept. There's something tender in that, the public noise versus a private shelf, like this Arbuthnotiana: The Story of the St. Alb-ns Ghost (1712) A Catalogue of Dr. Arbuthnot's Library (1779) — Background and Themes—a ghost and a catalog, both lingering softly after the shouting dies down.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
What did you think of this book?
Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.