Memoirs to Illustrate the History of My Time, Volume 1 — Reading Companion

(0 User reviews) 390

In Category - Government

Authors: Guizot, François, 1787-1874, Cole, John William, -1870 [Translator] Digital Source: Project Gutenberg Gutenberg Release Year: 2009 First Publication Year: Not confirmed

Key Word: France -- History -- Restoration, 1814-1830; France -- History -- Louis Philippe, 1830-1848; France -- Politics and government -- 1814-1830; France -- Politics and government -- 1830-1848; Europe -- Politics and government -- 1815-1848 Target Reader: Readers of public-domain and historical texts

Book Edition: Project Gutenberg digital edition Book Language: en

Edition facts

Words 130,267

Reading time 567 min

Text sections 13

For Memoirs to Illustrate the History of My Time, Volume 1 — Reading Companion, the stored edition analysis reports 130,267 words, 9 hr 27 min estimated reading time, and 13 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 24.5 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “France -- History -- Restoration, 1814-1830,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Source: Project Gutenberg record #28169

François Guizot's memoir of the Restoration era, translated by John William Cole, uses precise diction and character sketches to dissect political factions. The excerpts reveal a narrator who weighs motives, contrasts personalities like Manuel and Lafayette, and frames events through authorial judgment rather than neutral reportage.

Editorial Edition Score 4.8/5

★★★★★ ★★★★★

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated

Description quality20 pts
Title & short description10 pts
Source metadata20 pts
Text length15 pts
Chapters / structure15 pts
EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

File: pg28169

Read the Text

FRANCE BEFORE THE RESTORATION.

My Reasons for publishing these Memoirs during my Life.--My Introduction into Society.--My First Acquaintance with M. de Chateaubriand, M. de Suard, Madame de Stael, M. de Fontanes, M. Royer-Collard.--Proposal to appoint me Auditor in the Imperial State Council.--Why the Appointment did not take place.--I enter the University and begin my Course of Lectures on Modern History.--Liberal and Royalist Parties.--Characters of the different Oppositions towards the Close of the Empire.--Attempted resistance of the Legislative Body.--MM. Laine, Gallois, Maine-Biran, Raynouard, and Flaugergues.--I leave Paris for Nismes.--State of Paris and France in March, 1814.--The Restoration takes place.--I return to Paris, and am appointed Secretary-General to the Ministry of the Interior. 1

Sentiments with which I commenced Public Life.--True Cause and Character of the Restoration.--Capital Error of the Imperial Senate.--The Charter suffers from it.--Various Objections to the the Charter.--Why they were Futile.--Cabinet of King Louis XVIII.--Unfitness of the Principal Ministers for Constitutional Government.--M. de Talleyrand.--The Abbe de Montesquieu.--M. de Blacas.--Louis XVIII.--Principal Affairs in which I was concerned at that Epoch.--Account of the State of the Kingdom laid before the Chambers.--Bill respecting the Press.--Decree for the Reform of Public Instruction.--State of the Government and the Country.--Their Common Inexperience.--Effects of the Liberal System.--Estimate of Public Discontent and Conspiracies.--Saying of Napoleon on the Facility of his Return. 27

I immediately leave the Ministry of the Interior, to resume my Lectures.--Unsettled Feeling of the Middle Classes on the Return of Napoleon.--Its Real Causes.--Sentiments of Foreign Nations and Governments towards Napoleon.--Apparent Reconciliation, but Real Struggle, between Napoleon and the Liberals.--The Federates.--Carnot and Fouche.--Demonstration of Liberty during the Hundred Days, even in the Imperial Palace.--Louis XVIII. and his Council at Ghent.--The Congress and M. de Talleyrand at Vienna.--I go to Ghent on the part of the Constitutional Royalist Committee at Paris.--My Notions and Opinions during this Journey.--State of Parties at Ghent.--My Conversation with Louis XVIII.--M. de Blacas.--M. de Chateaubriand.--M. de Talleyrand returns from Vienna.--Louis XVIII. re-enters France.--Intrigue planned at Mons and defeated at Cambray.--Blindness and Imbecility of the Chamber of Representatives.--My Opinion respecting the Admission of Fouche into the King's Cabinet. 58

Fall of M. de Talleyrand and Fouche.--Formation of the Duke de Richelieu's Cabinet.--My Connection as Secretary-General of the Administration of Justice with M. de Marbois, Keeper of the Great Seal.--Meeting and Aspect of the Chamber of Deputies.--Intentions and Attitude of the Old Royalist Faction.--Formation, and Composition of a New Royalist Party.--Struggle of Classes under the cloak of Parties.--Provisional Laws.--Bill of Amnesty.--The Centre becomes the Government Party, and the Right, the Opposition.--Questions upon the connection between the State and the Church.--State of the Government beyond the Chambers.--Insufficiency of its Resistance to the spirit of Re-action.--The Duke of Feltri and General Bernard.--Trial of Marshal Ney.--Controversy between M. de Vitrolles and Me.--Closing of the Session.--Modifications in the Cabinet.--M. Laine Minister of the Interior.--I leave the Ministry of Justice and enter the State Council as Master of Requests.--The Cabinet enters into Contests with the Right-hand Party.--M. Decazes.--Position of MM. Royer-Collard and De Serre.--Opposition of M. de Chateaubriand.--The Country declares against the Chamber of Deputies.--Efforts of M. Decazes to bring about a Dissolution.--The King determines on it.--Decree of the 5th of September, 1816. 97

GOVERNMENT OF THE CENTRE.

Continue Reading →

François Guizot opens his memoirs not with a personal anecdote but with a rationale: he publishes during his lifetime to shape how his political career is understood. The translator, John William Cole, preserves Guizot's measured, analytical voice—a tone that treats even allies as subjects for dissection. In the excerpts, Guizot describes figures like Manuel and Lafayette through layered contrasts: one is “open, improvident, and rash,” the other “reserved, calculating, and prudent even in his violence.” Such pairings reveal a method of character assessment that prioritizes temperament and motive over simple allegiance.

Diction as Political Analysis

Guizot’s word choices often carry implicit judgment. He calls Manuel “the obedient child and able defender of the past revolution,” a phrase that diminishes Manuel’s independence while acknowledging his skill. Lafayette is “a noble gentleman, liberal and popular, not naturally a revolutionist”—the qualifier “not naturally” suggests a man led by circumstance rather than conviction. These formulations are not neutral; they position Guizot as a discerning observer who sees through public facades. His vocabulary for opposition figures includes “instrument and ornament,” “chimerical but not hopeful fanaticism,” and “vain but tragical plots,” each term narrowing the gap between description and evaluation.

Structure of Contrast and Parallel

The excerpt on Manuel and Lafayette is built on a sustained comparison. Guizot first establishes their differences in openness, prudence, and social standing, then pivots to their shared role as opposition leaders. He uses parallel constructions: “While one was open… the other was… reserved.” This rhetorical symmetry gives the passage a courtroom-like clarity, as if Guizot is presenting evidence. The structure extends to his treatment of d’Argenson, whom he calls “the most impassioned of the three” yet “little suited for action.” By arranging these portraits in sequence, Guizot creates a typology of opposition—each figure defined by a specific blend of conviction and limitation.

The Narrator’s Implied Authority

Guizot rarely uses the first person in these passages, but his presence is felt through authoritative phrasing. He declares that “no two people could less resemble each other” than Manuel and Lafayette, a statement that assumes intimate knowledge. He describes the inner workings of secret societies and the “projects and preliminary deliberations of the conspiring opposition” as if he were a participant or confidant. Yet the excerpts do not specify his own role in these events. The effect is a memoir that claims proximity to power without always documenting it, leaving the reader to gauge the reliability of a narrator who presents himself as both insider and judge.

Setting Through Political Atmosphere

Guizot conveys the Restoration’s mood not through physical description but through the language of tension and consequence. He notes that plots produced “nineteen capital condemnations, eleven of which were carried into effect,” a stark numerical detail that grounds the narrative in real stakes. He describes the opposition as “dogged at every step by authority,” using passive constructions that suggest a pervasive surveillance. The setting is thus psychological and political: a France where “the mind is bewildered, and the heart recoils.” This abstract geography—of factions, conspiracies, and executions—defines the era more vividly than any landscape could.

Readers will find that Guizot’s memoir rewards attention to his syntactic choices and evaluative vocabulary. He is not a neutral chronicler but a participant who shapes his material through contrast, qualification, and implied judgment. The excerpts suggest a work that is as much about the art of political portraiture as about the events themselves. For those interested in how memoirists construct authority, Guizot’s method offers a studied example.

Rain drummed on the window while Guizot weighed Manuel against Lafayette, his careful judgments feeling like conversations overheard. That evening, still thinking about how political character reveals itself in small gestures, my hand drifted to the shelf and pulled down The Grip cartoons: vols. I & II, May 1873 to May 1874 — A Closer Reading. Different era, same instinct—watching personalities sharpen under pressure, only this time through ink and satire rather than prose.